This episode opens with the Treasury’s decision to double up on its long-end bond purchases, a move Jim and Bobby read as a form of yield curve control that’s forcing more issuance on the short end and pressuring the dollar even as headline yields drift lower. It’s a good example of how this show tends to work, a quick macro download between the hosts before the real meat of the episode arrives with the guest, and here that guest is Jared Johnson, co-founder of Johnson Randall and manager of the Catalyst Plus Fund. Jared’s approach centers on selling put spreads against stocks he genuinely wants to own, effectively getting paid to wait for a price he’s already decided is attractive, and if the stock doesn’t fall to that level, he simply lets the spread expire and collects the premium instead.
Jared walks through his SpaceX position as a concrete example of the strategy in action, describing how he sold puts against the stock after its post-IPO high near 225, eventually taking assignment around the 150 level and ending up with a cost basis of 125 once the premium collected got factored in. From there he layers in covered calls to keep bringing the cost basis down further, a strategy he applies broadly rather than treating any single position as a one-off. He’s candid that this isn’t a buy-and-hold philosophy, his average holding period runs somewhere in the two-to-six-week range, and he’s comfortable rotating in and out of a name like Micron ten or fifteen times during a single uptrend rather than trying to ride the whole move in one position. It’s a mindset that trades the emotional satisfaction of catching a huge single move for a more repeatable, mechanical process built around collecting premium and managing cost basis.
The conversation with Jared turns genuinely interesting when Bobby pushes on downside risk, specifically asking what happens to this put-spread approach in a 2008-style scenario where the market loses 40% of its value in a broad, indiscriminate selloff. Jared is direct in his answer, explaining that because he’s always long the far leg of a put spread rather than simply selling naked puts, his defined risk is baked in from the start, meaning that even in a genuine crash his losses would be a fraction of what a fully invested, long-only equity position would suffer. He backs this up by pointing to his own history trading through 2008, COVID, and the 2022 selloff, and by noting that his fund has consistently run at roughly half the S&P’s drawdown during actual stress periods, a track record that lends real credibility to what could otherwise sound like a purely theoretical risk-management pitch.
Beyond the mechanics, this episode has a genuinely reflective, almost philosophical quality that separates it from a straightforward trade-idea show. Jared and the hosts spend real time on the psychological side of investing, touching on the well-worn but still striking observation that some of the best-performing brokerage accounts belong to people who simply forgot they owned the assets, or who passed away and left the position untouched for years, a pointed reminder that inaction is sometimes the highest-performing strategy of all. Bobby connects this to his own approach of only trading stocks he wouldn’t mind holding long-term, a subtle but important distinction from traders who rationalize holding a losing position simply because they don’t want to admit being wrong. There’s also a candid, useful discussion of fund taxation, with Jared noting that investors in his structure face standard long-term and short-term capital gains treatment, with a Cayman feeder available for charitable or tax-exempt investors, a detail that’s genuinely helpful for anyone evaluating whether a fund like this fits their own account structure.
By the close, the episode has covered a lot of ground, from Treasury bond mechanics to options-based risk management to the psychology of not overtrading, but the throughline is consistent: Jared’s entire process is built around using options to acquire assets he wants at prices he’s already decided are fair, while structurally limiting how much a genuine market crash can hurt him. For traders who assume options are inherently riskier than owning stock outright, this episode makes a clear, well-argued case for the opposite view, that used deliberately, options can be one of the more conservative tools available for building a long-term equity position.